Comarow’s Corner Stats: Duke’s Recent 2nd Half Struggles

Here are the stats showing Duke’s struggles in the 2nd half of their last four games compared to the 1st half.

 

1st Half to 2^nd Half Points Off Turnovers Differential

NC State (-1) (-1) = Even

Miami (+1) (-8) = -9

Louisville (+3) (-5) = -8

Pitt (+14) (-6) = -20

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half Points in Paint Differential

NC State (-4) (-10) = -6

Miami (+2) (even) = -2

Louisville (+10) (-2) = -12

Pitt (-6) (-12) = -6

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half 2^nd Chance Points Differential

NC State (+2) (+3) = +1

Miami (-1) (+10) = +11

Louisville (+5) (-8) = -13

Pitt (+2) (-8) = -10

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half Fast Break Points Differential

NC State (+3) (-4) = -7

Miami (-4) (-6) = -2

Louisville (+4) (0) = -4

Pitt (-2) (-6) = -4

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half Bench Points Differential

NC State (+3) (-17) = -20

Miami (-2) (-12) = -10

Louisville (+2) (-6) = -8

Pitt (+4) (-1) = -5

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half Points Allowed

NC State (37) (50) = -13

Miami (34) (56) = -22

Louisville (20) (32) = -12

Pitt (25) (40) = -14

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half Point Differential Differential

NC State (-4) (-8) = -4

Miami (+1) (-17) = -18

Louisville (+10) (+1) = -9

Pitt (+16) (-2) = -18

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half FG% Defense

NC State (52%) (58%) = -6%

Miami (38%) (67%) = -29%

Louisville (23%) (37%) = -14%

Pitt (37%) (52%) = -15%

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half Three-Pt FG% Defense Differential

NC State (Even) (5-8 for 62.5% both halves, so still awful)

Miami (36%) (67%) = -30%

Louisville (15%) (17) = -2%

Pitt (-) (43%) = -43%

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half Duke Turnovers Committed Differential

NC State (4) (6) = +2, which is bad

Miami (6) (9) = +3, which is bad

Louisville (3) (7) = +4, which is bad

Pitt (2) (7) = +5, which is bad

 

1^st Half to 2^nd Half Turnovers Forced Differential

NC State (4) (6) = +2, which is good

Miami (6) (5) = -1, which is bad

Louisville (6) (4) = -2, which is bad

Pitt (6) (5) = -1, which is bad

 

All stats from http://www.goduke.com